|
Poster:
|
 Tyler |
Date:
|
September 25, 2007 07:25:26pm |
|
Forum:
|
etree
|
Subject:
|
Re: False MD5 Failures - New FLAC version cause? |
When this was brought up before, here's what the engineers said / did:
"Ok, I have just compiled 1.1.4, latest tarball from sourceforge.
brak@ia340914:/2/items/rrfb2007-05-10$ ~/src/flac-1.1.4/src/flac/flac -v
flac 1.1.4
Got this error:
brak@ia340914:/2/items/rrfb2007-05-10$ ~/src/flac-1.1.4/src/flac/flac -t
rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac
flac 1.1.4, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007 Josh
Coalson
flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are
welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type `flac' for
details.
rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac: testing, 12% completerrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac:
*** Got error code 2:FLAC__STREAM_DECODER_ERROR_STATUS_FRAME_CRC_MISMATCH
rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac: ERROR while decoding data
state = FLAC__STREAM_DECODER_READ_FRAME
Which matches the error we are getting with the version in
production... strangely also at th 12% mark.
/usr/bin/flac -t '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t02.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t03.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t04.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t05.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t06.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t07.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t08.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t09.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t10.flac' '/tmp/derive/rrfb2007-05-10/rrfb2007-05-10d1t11.flac'
flac 1.1.2, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005 Josh Coalson
flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are
welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type `flac' for details.
rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac: testing, 4% complete
rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac: testing, 8% complete
rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac: testing, 12% completerrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac: *** Got error code 2:FLAC__STREAM_DECODER_ERROR_STATUS_FRAME_CRC_MISMATCH
rrfb2007-05-10d1t01.flac: ERROR while decoding data
state = FLAC__STREAM_DECODER_READ_FRAME
rrfb2007-05-10d1t02.flac: testing, 4% complete
----
and from the flac mailing list themselves:
"> all versions of FLAC are forwards-compatible
> unless the middle version number changes.
> So if it was, say, 1.1.4 versus 1.0.1, you might,
> possibly, have a problem. Both versions 1.1.x?
> No compatibility issue."
So not sure what to tell you. Are you absolutely sure there isn't something on your end?
|
Poster:
|
mkdevo |
Date:
|
September 26, 2007 08:35:34am |
|
Forum:
|
etree
|
Subject:
|
Re: False MD5 Failures - New FLAC version cause? |
well, i'm using FLAC 1.2.1; LMA is using 1.1.2, so i guess it's a compatibility issue, since the middle number changed.
i didn't think/know i was doing anything wrong by using the latest version of FLAC. i heard a new version was released, and i like to keep things current, so i grabbed it.
i'm perfectly fine with going back to a previous version if my FLACs aren't going to be accepted by the LMA. however, i've uploaded 3-4 24-bit shows with the new version (note that my 16-bit shows with the new version have been fine), and it will be an enormous waste of time if i need to reencode and reupload them.
so, can these shows be manually approved by someone, since they did not, in fact, actually fail any MD5 check?
|
Poster:
|
Tyler |
Date:
|
October 01, 2007 01:56:02pm |
|
Forum:
|
etree
|
Subject:
|
Re: False MD5 Failures - New FLAC version cause? |
The other batch of e-mails occurred because I re-ran all the failed md5 lines currently on the LMA (including yours) this 're-sends' the e-mails out to people who have bad shows to hopefully kick them in the pants to fix the missing track / missing .txt file / etc.
This does not apply to you. I've ping'd the engineers, but as of now, no reply. They must be busy with other stuff, but as soon as they get to it, i'll let you know. unfortunately it is out of mine and the other 'normal' admins's hands.
If you are really antsy, I would say though that the probable speedier solution is to just encode the show using the old flac version 24-bit and 'checkout' the show, delete the files online and then upload the new files and then checkin the show.
I would say to please just hang tight, since having the shows up provides a valuable insight to the engineers to the specific failure problems that the new flac version has with our system. Hopefully they get to it this week. hold tight. :)
tyler
TVNews
OpenLibrary